ABSTRACT
Cross-reactive cellular and humoral immunity can substantially contribute to antiviral defense against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC). While the adult SARS-CoV-2 cellular and humoral immunity and its cross-recognition potential against VOC is broadly analyzed, similar data regarding the pediatric population are missing. In this study, we perform an analysis of the humoral and cellular SARS-CoV-2 response immune of 32 convalescent COVID-19 children (children), 27 convalescent vaccinated adults(C+V+) and 7 unvaccinated convalescent adults (C+V-). SARS-CoV-2 reactive T cell response is analyzed via multiparametric flowcytometry and humoral immunity is addressed via pseudovirus neutralization assay. Similarly to adults, a significant reduction of cross-reactive neutralizing capacity against delta and omicron VOC was observed 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. While SAR-CoV-2 neutralizing capacity was comparable among children and C+V- against all VOC, children demonstrated as expected an inferior humoral response when compared to C+V+. Nevertheless, children generated SARS-CoV-2 reactive T cells with broad cross-recognition potential. When compared to V+C+, children presented even comparable frequencies of WT-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with high avidity. Our results suggest that following SARS-CoV-2 infection children generate a humoral SARS-CoV-2 response with neutralizing potential comparable to unvaccinated COVID-19 convalescent adults as well a sustained SARS-CoV-2 cellular response cross-reactive to VOC. Key statement Following SARS-CoV-2 infection children generate a humoral SARS-CoV-2 response with neutralizing potential comparable to unvaccinated COVID-19 convalescent adults as well a sustained robust SARS-CoV-2 cellular response cross-reactive to VOC, comparable to vaccinated convalescent adults.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
The role of autoimmunity in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is not well explored, although clinicians observe a growing population of convalescent COVID-19 patients with manifestation of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19. We analyzed the immune response in 40 post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 patients with non-specific PASC manifestation and 15 COVID-19 convalescent healthy donors. The phenotyping of lymphocytes showed a significantly higher number of CD8+ T cells expressing the Epstein-Barr virus induced G protein coupled receptor 2, chemokine receptor CXCR3 and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 playing an important role in inflammation and migration in PASC patients compared to controls. Additionally, a stronger, SARS-CoV-2 reactive CD8+ T cell response, characterized by IFN{gamma} production and predominant TEMRA phenotype but low SARS-CoV-2 avidity was detected in PASC patients compared to controls. Furthermore, higher titers of several autoantibodies were detected among PASC patients. Our data suggest that a persistent inflammatory response triggered by SARS-CoV-2 might be responsible for the observed sequelae in PASC patients. These results may have implications on future therapeutic strategies.
Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19 , InflammationABSTRACT
BackgroundWhen patients with chronic kidney disease are infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) they can face two specific problems: Virus-specific immune responses may be impaired and remdesivir, an antiviral drug described to shorten the time to recovery, is contraindicated. Antiviral treatment with convalescent plasma could be an alternative treatment option. MethodsIn this case series we present two kidney transplant recipients and two patients dependent on haemodialysis who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and received convalescent plasma. Antibodies against the spike 1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 were determined sequentially by IgG ELISA and neutralization assay and specific T cell responses by interferon-gamma ELISpot. ResultsPrior to treatment, in three patients antibodies were undetectable by ELISA (ratio < 1.1), corresponding to low neutralizing antibody titers ([≤] 1:40). One patient was also negative to the ELISpot and two showed weak responses. After convalescent plasma treatment we observed an increase of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (IgG ratio and neutralization titer) and of specific T cell responses. After intermittent clinical improvement one kidney transplant recipient again developed typical symptoms at day 12 after treatment and received a second cycle of convalescent plasma treatment. Altogether, three patients clinically improved and could be discharged from hospital. However, one multimorbid female in her early eighties deceased. ConclusionsOur data suggest that the success of convalescent plasma therapy may only be temporary in patients with chronic kidney disease; which requires an adaptation of the treatment regimen. Close monitoring after treatment is needed for this patient group.